Not Registered? Register Now.

1. My Profile >2. Additional Information

By submitting below you certify that you have read and agree to our privacy policy.

Macro Alerts

Is China a Market in a Bubble?

22 Jul 2015

Is China a Market in a Bubble?

The spectacular rise of the local Shanghai equity market — collectively known as the A-shares China market — and its dramatic 30% fall in three weeks has many observers painting the broad Chinese equity market as a stereotypical bubble.[1]

There were many stocks with extreme valuations, a large rush of unsophisticated traders, a surge in stock trading with borrowed money and, critically, a general sense that there was not sufficient (if any) underlying growth in the economy or corporate profits to justify this surge in prices.

Yet not all Chinese equities are the same, and there are some pockets of what may be considered deeper value segments of the global opportunity set in the Chinese equity market.

A-Shares/H-Shares Disconnect

Notably, there has been a huge discrepancy in performance between the stocks trading in Shanghai and the exact same stocks that are trading in the Hong Kong market (where most international investors are able to trade).

Part of the flow in the local A-shares market this year was based on speculation that more index providers are going to add China A-shares to their indices. Vanguard, which utilizes FTSE indices in its emerging market benchmark tracking strategies, was the first major index provider to adopt provisional indices and to add A-shares to its emerging market strategies. On June 10 2015, MSCI announced that it was considering adding A-shares but thought the market was not quite ready. The fact that more than 1,000 companies suspended trading — basically because they did not like the market activity in early July — probably will not provide much comfort to MSCI in adding A-shares.

WisdomTree has an emerging markets index, the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index (WTEMHY), which selects from more than 1,200 emerging market dividend payers in an effort to find the lowest-priced segment of the market. The Index ranks eligible stocks by their dividend yield and then selects the top 30%. This is a deeper value selection  standard than simple market cap weighting or choosing just dividend-paying stocks. Back in 2008 and 2009, Chinese companies represented a very small portion of this index — representing no more than 3% of the index weight at a time when broad market cap-weighted indexes had as much as a 20% weighting in China.

Today, China is the largest country in this value index with weights over 20%. The reason: a number of the H-shares Chinese stocks, particularly banks, have dividend yields north of 5%. The weighted average yield of the Chinese stocks in the WTEMHY index is 5.3% with a weighted average price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of less than 8x. On a valuation basis these stocks do not look like a bubble; rather, they may be relatively lower priced if they can maintain their current earnings and dividend levels.

The Chinese stocks in the WTEMHY index are absolutely not the same “bubble” stocks trading on the local ChiNext (tech-heavy) exchange, which had median P/E ratios around 100x and dividend yields of 50 basis points.[2]

Interestingly, the same high-dividend Chinese stocks in WTEMHY also have corresponding A-shares trading on the local market. The same stocks trading in China — offering ownership in the same companies — have a dividend yield of just 3.7% (160 basis points less than the H-shares) and a P/E ratio over 12x (approximately 55% higher P/E multiple).

One can see the dramatic differential in performance between H-shares and A-shares over the past year. China Construction Bank A-shares  were up 89% over the year, while the same H-share was up just 20%. [3] The weighted average performance of all the A-share versions of stocks in WTEMHY was 96% over the prior year, while the H-shares in WTEMHY were up just 19%.

Valuation and Return Differences between H-Shares and A-Shares

Valuation and return differences between H-shares and A-Shares

If you look back over 15 years, there is an interesting comparison between the Shanghai Composite of A-shares and the MSCI China Index. Following the market crash in 2008, the Shanghai Composite languished and underperformed the H-shares MSCI China Index significantly over the next five years. Starting in late June 2014, that performance gap started to close with very strong returns in A-shares; the performance of A-shares recently eclipsed H-shares’ performance cumulatively.

Index Performance Comparison

  Index Performance Comparison

With the Chinese market regularly moving 5% every day, it is tough to call what will happen in the short term. One thing that is clear though is that not all stocks in China are in high-valuation bubble-like territory. Certainly the volatility makes investing there highly uncertain, but it looks like there are good value stocks to be had in diversified emerging market strategies that focus on relative valuations in China.

Investors sharing this sentiment may consider the following ETF:

All data is sourced from WisdomTree and Bloomberg, unless otherwise stated.  


WisdomTree Europe Ltd is an appointed representative of Mirabella Financial Services LLP which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The value of an investment in ETPs may go down as well as up and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. An investment in ETPs is dependent on the performance of the underlying index, less costs, but it is not expected to match that performance precisely. ETPs involve numerous risks including among others, general market risks relating to the relevant underlying index, credit risks on the provider of index swaps utilised in the ETP, exchange rate risks, interest rate risks, inflationary risks, liquidity risks and legal and regulatory risks. ETPs offering daily leveraged or daily short exposures (“Leveraged ETPs”) are products which feature specific risks that prospective investors should understand before investing in them. Higher volatility of the underlying indices and holding periods longer than a day may have an adverse impact on the performance of Leveraged ETPs.  As such, Leveraged ETPs are intended for financially sophisticated investors who wish to take a short term view on the underlying indices. As a consequence, WisdomTree Europe Ltd is not promoting or marketing BOOST ETPs to Retail Clients. Investors should refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors" and “Economic Overview of the ETP Securities” in the Prospectus for further details of these and other risks associated with an investment in Leveraged ETPs and consult their financial advisors as needed.  Within the United Kingdom, this document is only made available to professional clients and eligible counterparties as defined by the FCA. Under no circumstances should this document be forwarded to anyone in the United Kingdom who is not a professional client or eligible counterparty as defined by the FCA. This marketing information is intended for professional clients & sophisticated investors (as defined in the glossary of the FCA Handbook) only. This marketing information is derived from information generally available to the public from sources believed to be reliable although WisdomTree Europe Ltd does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information. All registered trademarks referred to herein have been licensed for use. None of the products discussed above are sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by any registered trademark owner and such owners make no representation or warranty regarding the advisability on dealing in any of the ETPs. [1] Source: Bloomberg, 12/06/15 – 08/07/15. [2] Source: Bloomberg, 09/07/15 [3] Source: Bloomberg, 09/07/14 – 09/07/15

Read More
Macro Alerts, Equities, Emerging Markets

This material is prepared by WisdomTree and its affiliates and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of production and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by WisdomTree, nor any affiliate, nor any of their officers, employees or agents. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.


By submitting below you certify that you have read and agree to our privacy policy.